[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0012884]: [patch] Queue is treated as empty if it isn't, but no agents meet the QUEUE_MIN_PENALTY and QUEUE_MAX_PENALTY criteria
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Oct 28 19:12:19 CDT 2008
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12884
======================================================================
Reported By: bcnit
Assigned To: twilson
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 12884
Category: Applications/app_queue
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: ready for testing
Asterisk Version: 1.6.1-beta1
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2008-06-18 12:19 CDT
Last Modified: 2008-10-28 19:12 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Queue is treated as empty if it isn't, but
no agents meet the QUEUE_MIN_PENALTY and QUEUE_MAX_PENALTY criteria
Description:
In a situation where a call is placed into a queue as follows:
exten => s,n,Set(QUEUE_MAX_PENALTY=1)
exten => s,n,Set(QUEUE_MIN_PENALTY=1)
exten =>
s,n,Queue(${ORGCODE}_${ORGQUEUE},ih,,${ORGCODE}/announce-incoming)
)
The queue is deemed to be empty if there are no agents with a penalty of 1
as a member of the queue.
We use queuerules.conf to raise the QUEUE_MAX_PENALTY value to overflow
calls to other departments and in our case (and I can imagine, other
people's too), it is perfectly legitimate to have members with a penalty of
2 logged in and no members with penalty 1.
As a result of this, the function QUEUE_MEMBER() returns incorrect data
(i.e. QUEUE_MEMBER(free) may return the "number of logged-in members for
the specified queue available to take a call" as 10, but in reality and
because of the penalty issue, it is zero.
I have been able to work around this by checking QUEUE_MEMBER(count) after
I receive a JOINEMPTY bounce out, incrementing QUEUE_MAX_PRIORITY and
trying again, but this is far from ideal!
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate 0012880 Queue() uses cached information to dete...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0094350) otherwiseguy (administrator) - 2008-10-28 19:12
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12884#c94350
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ok, this patch fixes the crash, and some issues where we were calling
update_qe_rule() when we (I think) didn't want to.
putnopvut, if you could look over my changes to make sure they make sense,
I'd appreciate it.
bcnit, it would be nice if you could test as well. I tested several
different cases, and am fairly confident, but more testing is always nice.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2008-10-28 19:12 otherwiseguy Note Added: 0094350
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list