[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013703]: Abort in free in queue show <name> command

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13703 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                davidw
Assigned To:                putnopvut
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   13703
Category:                   Applications/app_queue
Reproducibility:            have not tried
Severity:                   crash
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-10-15 08:56 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-10-15 11:53 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Abort in free in queue show <name> command
Description: 
We were getting bogus queue not found messages from the QUEUE_MEMBER (and
QUEUE_MEMBER_COUNT function), so after running "queue show", which gave the
truncated queue name, we tried queue show <name> with the full name.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0093731) putnopvut (administrator) - 2008-10-15 11:53
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13703#c93731 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I think I may have found the problem, and it appears to have to do with a
piece of bad logic in the function which handles the 'queue show' CLI
command. Essentially, what I've found is that if you call queue show
<some_queue>, then all realtime queues will end up with their reference
counts one lower than they should be. Just to be sure I'm on the right
track, though, can you confirm that you are using realtime queues? 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-10-15 11:53 putnopvut      Note Added: 0093731                          
======================================================================