[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0012854]: Unparked caller has ability to transfer

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12854 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                davidw
Assigned To:                otherwiseguy
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   12854
Category:                   Resources/res_features
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  1.4  
SVN Revision (number only!): 122589 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-06-13 13:12 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-10-14 12:16 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Unparked caller has ability to transfer
Description: 
Please re-open http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9565.  It was closed in favour
of http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11898, but the fix for
that did not actually address the issue in
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9565.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0093623) davidw (reporter) - 2008-10-14 12:16
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12854#c93623 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
It's OK for direct 700/701 operation.  It's OK for AMI provided that the
connection to the parker didn't have transfer permission.  If the initial
connection to the parker had transfer permission, the unparker gets that,
which doensn't feel right to me.

This isn't a problem for our primary requirement, although it eliminates
one possible strategy for dealing with the case of a CTI failure.  However,
it seems to give away a privilege. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-10-14 12:16 davidw         Note Added: 0093623                          
======================================================================