[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013822]: [patch] multiple voicemail and directory modules

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13822 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                tzafrir
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   13822
Category:                   Core/BuildSystem
Reproducibility:            N/A
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-11-02 11:06 CST
Last Modified:              2008-11-19 17:33 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] multiple voicemail and directory modules
Description: 
The attached patch is intended to generate multiple instances of
app_voicemail and app_directory that can be built separately.

This is done by copying e.g. app_voicemail.c to app_voicemail_imap.c and
editing its MODULES comment.

This is a first working draft (I'm testing it in the Debian package. We
initially had a much uglier hack).  

Obvious problem of this at run-time is that the multiple voicemail or
directory modules cannot be loaded together and an explicit noload must be
used.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0095140) qwell (administrator) - 2008-11-19 17:33
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13822#c95140 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I have to agree with Corydon76.  While it would make things easier (I do
something similar in my AsteriskNOW packages), it is the wrong way to go
and should be done properly if it's to be committed.

I think this should be closed, until we can do it the "Right Way". 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-11-19 17:33 qwell          Note Added: 0095140                          
======================================================================