[asterisk-bugs] [DAHDI-linux 0013206]: [patch] ztdynamic double buffering on rx, statistics

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13206 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                biohumanoid
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    DAHDI-linux
Issue ID:                   13206
Category:                   dahdi_dynamic
Reproducibility:            have not tried
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     confirmed
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-07-31 00:28 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-11-10 18:38 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] ztdynamic double buffering on rx, statistics
Description: 
In current implementation:
1. If we have more than one TDMoE device, we'll have a slip/skip. 2 TDMoE
devices can have phase jitter.
2. We have no statistics (which is necessary).
3. ztdynamic can't be a master for zaptel (but why not ?)
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate       0012406 [patch] ztdynamic double buffering on r...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0094727) biohumanoid (reporter) - 2008-11-10 18:38
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13206#c94727 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I've posted the patches for dahdi, they fixes syncronization problems.
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13205
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13206
None of them being tested in trunk, but 2.1 release is coming soon, and it
have broken dahdi_dynamic, dumb master handling (first registered SPAN is
the master), and so on...

Please, let me know, if they are going to be reviewed or not.
Feel free to ask me if I wrote something not clear.
Thanks. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-11-10 18:38 biohumanoid    Note Added: 0094727                          
======================================================================