[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013220]: Calls in high-weighted queue block low-weighted
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Nov 10 09:05:50 CST 2008
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://insects.digium.com/view.php?id=13220
======================================================================
Reported By: garychen
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 13220
Category: Applications/app_queue
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: feedback
Asterisk Version: 1.4.19
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2008-08-01 08:28 CDT
Last Modified: 2008-11-10 09:05 CST
======================================================================
Summary: Calls in high-weighted queue block low-weighted
Description:
I have two queues, weighted 4 and 5. High priority calls are placed in
Q6002, while low priority ones in Q6001.
All agents are member of both queues.
The problem is whenever there's a high priority call ringing on an agent
(the agent not answer the call), low priority calls not routed to any idle
agents. They are blocked.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0094705) garychen (reporter) - 2008-11-10 09:05
http://insects.digium.com/view.php?id=13220#c94705
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Corydon76: I am not able to sign the agreement because there is no captcha
image shown on that page. On FireFox, it shows nothing. On IE, it shows a
red-cross of bad image.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2008-11-10 09:05 garychen Note Added: 0094705
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list