[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010144]: No license statemement in the sound tarballs

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10144 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                user4338
Assigned To:                jtodd
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   10144
Category:                   Sounds
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.4.6 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        No 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2007-07-07 06:30 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-11-03 12:54 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    No license statemement in the sound tarballs
Description: 
I just packaged the en/es/fr sounds in an rpm
(http://www.provocation.net/rpms/ ) and put "GPL" as the license in lack of
better. Obviously, the GPL works for code, not for sound recordings. No
matter how I search the websites though, I can't find any reference to a
license for the sounds. Strictly speaking, when no explicit license to
redistribute is given, copyright applies and redistribution is forbidden.
This is not a good situation, so perhaps you could add a CC license or
similar to the CREDITS-asterisk-core-<lang>-<version> files.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate       0012977 No clear license for sound files
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0094524) jcollie (manager) - 2008-11-03 12:54
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10144#c94524 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
As long as the Non-Commercial clauses are not added to the license Fedora
should be fine. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-11-03 12:54 jcollie        Note Added: 0094524                          
======================================================================