[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0008089]: [patch] The record# parameter in ENUMLOOKUP is ignored

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8089 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                otmar
Assigned To:                bbryant
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   8089
Category:                   Functions/NewFeature
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0-beta5 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 50028 
Disclaimer on File?:        Yes 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             10-04-2006 10:19 CDT
Last Modified:              05-06-2008 09:52 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] The record# parameter in ENUMLOOKUP is
ignored
Description: 
In function_enum, the args.record parameter is never evaluated. 

That's also a bug in ast_get_enum, which does not offer a seperate
parameter for this.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0005526 [patch] Carrier ENUM support + some rew...
related to          0005666 [patch][post 1.4] Add NAPTR string pars...
related to          0011560 ENUM LOOKUP IS NOT WORKING AGAIN
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 snuffy - 05-06-08 09:52  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I've updated this file.. removing the extra regex searching.
This seems to be giving decent results aside from counting of records.
i also have a standard e164 for test.
+43780004711 was listed on the enum page and will return results
so ENUMLOOKUP(+43780004711) would work. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
05-06-08 09:52  snuffy         Note Added: 0086461                          
======================================================================