[asterisk-bugs] [Zaptel 0012241]: [patch] New Ztdynamic driver for Redfone Communications foneBRIDGE 2 platform

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12241 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                brettcar
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Zaptel
Issue ID:                   12241
Category:                   NewFeature
Reproducibility:            N/A
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Zaptel Version:             1.4.9.2 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             03-17-2008 12:50 CDT
Last Modified:              03-31-2008 19:20 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] New Ztdynamic driver for Redfone
Communications foneBRIDGE 2 platform
Description: 
Attached is the current production code used for Redfone's foneBRIDGE 2
platform that utilizes multiframe ztdynamic/ztd-eth packets. Makefiles et
cetera not included but could be provided if needed -- it's just a standard
module like ztd-eth.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 russell - 03-31-08 19:20  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Well, hopefully the click through license agreement won't be too much of a
burden.  We switched to electronic handling of the process to make it much
easier.  The text of the agreement changed when we switched to the new
system, so we have to get new submissions from everyone.  But, like I said,
we have tried to make it as easy as possible.

I'm not trying to give you a hard time.  I'm trying to ensure that we
follow the rules in place with regards to licensing.  Before that is taken
care of, I'm not even supposed to look at the code, so I haven't been able
to give it a more thorough review than the copyright header for the most
part. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
03-31-08 19:20  russell        Note Added: 0084824                          
======================================================================