[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011025]: Unavailable peer not show in BLF of Thomson and Grandstream phones

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

The following issue has been RESOLVED. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11025 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                francesco_r
Assigned To:                oej
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   11025
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Interoperability
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     resolved
Asterisk Version:           1.4.13  
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
Resolution:                 won't fix
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             10-18-2007 09:35 CDT
Last Modified:              03-28-2008 17:32 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Unavailable peer not show in BLF of Thomson and
Grandstream phones
Description: 
I have upgraded some Asterisk 1.2.X machines to 1.4.13. Now when a peer is
unavailable the BLF of Grandstream GXP2000 or Thomson ST2030 display the
status of available (green led on GXP2000, led off on Thomson). With
asterisk 1.2 the BLF status on unavailability was busy (led on). Only the
Softphone X-Lite 3 display the correct status of a contact (Not online).
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0008735 [patch] transmit_state_notify for DIALO...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 qwell - 03-28-08 17:32  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
After discussing this, we agreed that the current behavior is what most
people would expect.

As francesco_r pointed out, changing this is quite trivial.

If you disagree, what I would recommend is starting a discussion on the
asterisk-dev mailing list, and seeing how many people think that it is
incorrect. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
03-28-08 17:32  qwell          Note Added: 0084745                          
======================================================================