[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0012177]: calls to multi_ldap function return with zero results (Pattern match/Queuemember broken)

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12177 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                fkhan
Assigned To:                Corydon76
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   12177
Category:                   Resources/res_config_ldap
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0-beta4 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             03-10-2008 12:58 CDT
Last Modified:              03-18-2008 06:06 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    calls to multi_ldap function return with zero
results (Pattern match/Queuemember broken)
Description: 
Any calls to the multi_ldap function in res_config_ldap.c return with zero
results. As far as my understanding is concerned, multi_ldap function is
required to return multiple results (as in pattern match) or when example a
QueueMember lookup is required. 

We might be able to fix this ourselves if somebody can guide us. The
function looks quite similar to the one in res_config_mysql so we cant seem
to figure out whats wrong.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0005768 [branch][post 1.4] LDAP Realtime driver
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 suretec - 03-18-08 06:06  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I've just added the latest schema files, which have a new version section
in the header to track oru changes etc.

Should they be uploaded to 0005768 instead? 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
03-18-08 06:06  suretec        Note Added: 0084122                          
======================================================================