[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0012211]: The LDAP version is not taken into account

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12211 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                sylvain
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   12211
Category:                   Resources/res_config_ldap
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.6.0 
SVN Revision (number only!): 108395 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             03-14-2008 05:00 CDT
Last Modified:              03-14-2008 15:20 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    The LDAP version is not taken into account
Description: 
if a version of LDAP protocol is set in general like here:
[_general]
host=linuxsde ; LDAP host(s)
port=10389 ;
protocol=3 ; Version of the LDAP protocol to use default is 3.
basedn=system ; Base DN
pass=secret ; Bind password
user=admin ; Bind DN

it is not taken into account and the protocol version is 2.
After code investigation, it seems that "version" is not read. I give in
additionnal Information the patch which make it work for 1.6.0 branch (with
previous patch making ldap working with unstandard port)
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0012209 if the LDAP port  is not 389, it's not ...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 juggie - 03-14-08 15:20  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Ok perfect, i wasnt sure if 'License Pending' on the file ment that it had
been submitted by the bug reporter, or if it was Pending in the general
sense. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
03-14-08 15:20  juggie         Note Added: 0084000                          
======================================================================