[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0012211]: The LDAP version is not taken into account

noreply at bugs.digium.com noreply at bugs.digium.com
Fri Mar 14 14:57:31 CDT 2008


The following issue has been UPDATED. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12211 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                sylvain
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   12211
Category:                   Resources/res_config_ldap
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.6.0 
SVN Revision (number only!): 108395 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             03-14-2008 05:00 CDT
Last Modified:              03-14-2008 14:57 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    The LDAP version is not taken into account
Description: 
if a version of LDAP protocol is set in general like here:
[_general]
host=linuxsde ; LDAP host(s)
port=10389 ;
protocol=3 ; Version of the LDAP protocol to use default is 3.
basedn=system ; Base DN
pass=secret ; Bind password
user=admin ; Bind DN

it is not taken into account and the protocol version is 2.
After code investigation, it seems that "version" is not read. I give in
additionnal Information the patch which make it work for 1.6.0 branch (with
previous patch making ldap working with unstandard port)
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0012209 if the LDAP port  is not 389, it's not ...
====================================================================== 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
03-14-08 14:57  russell        Additional Information Updated                   

======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list