[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0012215]: Asterisk returns 482 Loop Detected upon receiving re-invite

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12215 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                jpyle
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   12215
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            random
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.4.18 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             03-14-2008 11:45 CDT
Last Modified:              06-06-2008 09:02 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Asterisk returns 482 Loop Detected upon receiving
re-invite
Description: 
Asterisk sends a 482 Loop Detected upon receiving a presumably valid
re-INVITE.  Pedantic is enabled globally in sip.conf.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 remiq - 06-06-08 09:02  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Rjain was right about Asterisk not marking the channel UP after the 200 OK.
 Asterisk usually marks the channel UP after it sends the ACK, but that is
not happening.  Does anyone know what could possibly cause Asterisk not to
mark the channel UP once it receive the 200 OK?  Do you guys think the
channel is not getting locked and that is why it is handling the re-invite
without the channel getting marked UP thus detecing a loop?  If so where
should this change be? 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
06-06-08 09:02  remiq          Note Added: 0087893                          
======================================================================