[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013203]: [patch] [branch] [appdocsxml] Some fixes, and trying to start an entry point for patches to this branch

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13203 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                eliel
Assigned To:                bkruse
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   13203
Category:                   General
Reproducibility:            have not tried
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 134757 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-07-30 23:50 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-07-31 10:25 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] [branch] [appdocsxml] Some fixes, and trying
to start an entry point for patches to this branch
Description: 
I have many questions about the ideas about the implementation, what I have
done in this patch is a code review with minor fixes, and I was trying to
understand the idea behind the code, Please don't close this issue if the
patch is not ready, so I can continue submitting patches for this branch.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0090902) bkruse (manager) - 2008-07-31 10:25
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13203#c90902 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Great, being committed now.

I will request you get direct access to the branch, this is good work.

Only comments: on the big for loop, I cut that out of menuselect. I do
like your method much better, as it IS cleaner. Did you do any functional
testing to see if the basics were still in operation?

Thanks!

-bk 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-07-31 10:25 bkruse         Note Added: 0090902                          
======================================================================