[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011843]: Moved Temporarily Contact Transport information not used in next invite

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11843 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                pestermann
Assigned To:                bbryant
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   11843
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/Transfers
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     ready for testing
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0-beta9 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             01-25-2008 02:34 CST
Last Modified:              07-22-2008 15:20 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Moved Temporarily Contact Transport information not
used in next invite
Description: 
When getting back an Moved Temporarily from the called party the transport
information in the contact header is not used for the next invite based on
promiscredir=yes. 

In the SIP debug 
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate       0012026 Asterisk 1.6-beta3 does not follow sip ...
has duplicate       0012550 [SIP/TCP] received 302 Moved Temporaril...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 russell - 07-22-08 15:20  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
That message would be expected if you try to run this against beta9.  The
latest 1.6.0 code uses reference counted objects that aren't in that
version. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
07-22-08 15:20  russell        Note Added: 0090575                          
======================================================================