[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011870]: Problem connecting Asterisk to UMC-1000 using GR-303

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

The following issue has been ASSIGNED. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11870 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                PerryB
Assigned To:                mattf
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   11870
Category:                   Core/Channels
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.4.17 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             01-29-2008 14:06 CST
Last Modified:              01-30-2008 11:06 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Problem connecting Asterisk to UMC-1000 using GR-303
Description: 
Description: I can not establish GR-303 connectivity between Asterisk and
AFC/Tellabs UMC-1000 digital loop carrier. Asterisk indicates that the TMC
is up immediately after initialization; however the UMC shows both the TMC
and EOC in a “down” state. I can not find any data related to the state
of the EOC in Asterisk.

I have attached what I feel is pertinent data from both the UMC and
Asterisk. If additional information is required, please let me know, and I
will provide ASAP.

BTW, there's not a lot of onformation on this subject. That said, I
noticed references to GR-303 EOC and TMC switch types (8 and 9
respectively) in libpri.h along with other switch types as defined in
Zapata.conf. Is there a switch type for GR-303 similar to dms100 or 5ess in
zapata.conf or is the datafill in zaptel.conf and zapata.conf as provided
in the additional information section below sufficient?
====================================================================== 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
01-30-08 11:06  qwell          Status                   new => assigned     
01-30-08 11:06  qwell          Assigned To               => mattf           
======================================================================