[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011874]: [patch] VoicemailUsersList AMI action does not always send VoicemailUserEntryComplete event

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11874 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                srt
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   11874
Category:                   Applications/app_voicemail
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0-beta1 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 101126 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             01-29-2008 19:44 CST
Last Modified:              01-30-2008 09:40 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] VoicemailUsersList AMI action does not
always send VoicemailUserEntryComplete event
Description: 
All manager actions that send their response as a series of events send a
corresponding "complete" event on success.
VoicemailUsersList only sends the comlete event if there are more than 0
voicemail users. In Asterisk-Java this results in a timeout as the library
does not know if events will still follow or not.
The attached patch always sends the complete event. Additionally it
removes a superfluous "\r\n" in the ack message.
The patch is against trunk but the problem is also present in 1.6.0-beta1
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 Corydon76 - 01-30-08 09:40  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Isn't this actually a bug in the Java library, that it does not pay
attention to the response? 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
01-30-08 09:40  Corydon76      Note Added: 0081429                          
======================================================================