[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0009843]: [patch] /etc/init.d/asterisk is not "Linux Standard Base" compatible

noreply at bugs.digium.com noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Jan 29 02:24:38 CST 2008


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9843 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                ibc
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   9843
Category:                   Core/Configuration
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.4.4 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        No 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             05-31-2007 05:14 CDT
Last Modified:              01-29-2008 02:24 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] /etc/init.d/asterisk is not "Linux Standard
Base" compatible
Description: 
As we can read at
http://www.linux-foundation.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_3.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html:

"For all other init-script actions, the init script shall return an exit
status of zero if the action was successful. Otherwise, the exit status
shall be non-zero, as defined below. In addition to straightforward
success, the following situations are also to be considered successful":

- "running start on a service already running"

But this is not true since "/etc/init.d/asterisk start" return 1 if
Asterisk was already running. It should return 0.

In fact this is because the default behaviout of "start-stop-daemon" which
returns error (1) after "start" if the service was already running. So it
could be Debian issue.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 ibc - 01-29-08 02:24  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Yes, thanks, I didn't see it ;) 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
01-29-08 02:24  ibc            Note Added: 0081313                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list