[asterisk-bugs] [Zaptel 0007117]: [branch] move kernel to a subdirectory

noreply at bugs.digium.com noreply at bugs.digium.com
Sun Jan 27 23:35:16 CST 2008


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7117 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                tzafrir
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Zaptel
Issue ID:                   7117
Category:                   NewFeature
Reproducibility:            N/A
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     ready for testing
Zaptel Version:             1.4.5.1  
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 2321 
Disclaimer on File?:        Yes 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             05-09-2006 06:37 CDT
Last Modified:              01-27-2008 23:35 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [branch] move kernel to a subdirectory
Description: 
In order to reduce the clutter in the zaptel subdirectory, I would like to
separate kernel and userspace. Most of the utilities still build fine as I
added to CFLAGS '-Ikernel'

I'd like to start by moving the kernel files to a subdirectory kernel/ .
The branch team/group/kernelmove is used to demo this.

I currently created two "makefiles" in that subdirectory:
* makefile: used for 2.4
* Makefile: used for 2.6

I would have rather used Makefile/Kbuild instead of makefile/Makefile, but
Kbuild does not seem to be supported by earlier 2.6 versions (including
2.6.8 in my Debian Sarge). The idea is that a simple recursive gmake call
will pick up 'makefile', but the kernel 2.6's kbuild will pick up
'Makefile' instead.

For 2.6 the file is relatvely complete. For 2.4 it currently handles
building alone. Specifically 'clean' still does not work well. I personally
think that the 'install' target is overly-complex, and would like to use
this opportunity to re-examine it.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 bkruse - 01-27-08 23:35  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Any update on this? It has been awhile since the last comment.

Let me know the status of the issue and if we should close is.

I do not see that branch any longer. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
01-27-08 23:35  bkruse         Note Added: 0081244                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list