[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011750]: Asterisk ignores SDP when multiple Content-Type headers are present
noreply at bugs.digium.com
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Sat Jan 12 12:02:38 CST 2008
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11750
======================================================================
Reported By: tasker
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 11750
Category: Channels/chan_sip/Interoperability
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: 1.4.17
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 01-12-2008 09:56 CST
Last Modified: 01-12-2008 12:02 CST
======================================================================
Summary: Asterisk ignores SDP when multiple Content-Type
headers are present
Description:
Asterisk ignores the SDP information when multiple Content-Type headers are
defined. Specifically, it seems to happen when SDP is not the first header
in a multiple Content-Type situation. The call is still handled and results
in one-way audio (inbound RTP only).
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
tasker - 01-12-08 12:02
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Could this be the issue?
----------------------
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary=Telica-boundary
--Telica-boundary
Content-Type: application/sdp
Content-Disposition: session; handling=required
...
----------------------
The first Content-type defines a section called Telica-boundary. Within
that content is where SDP is defined.
Would Asterisk see that as being manufacturer specific data and ignoring
everything within Telica-boundary? It would seem to be correct behavior
according to the RFC, if I am understaning it correctly, thus it isn't a
bug.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
01-12-08 12:02 tasker Note Added: 0076812
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list