[asterisk-bugs] [Zaptel 0010353]: [patch] Add pci bus info to zaptel span

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

The following issue has been RESOLVED. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10353 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                cybershield
Assigned To:                qwell
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Zaptel
Issue ID:                   10353
Category:                   NewFeature
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     resolved
Zaptel Version:             1.4.4  
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             08-01-2007 04:27 CDT
Last Modified:              01-11-2008 14:18 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] Add pci bus info to zaptel span
Description: 
Add into struct zt_span and struct zt_spaninfo the pci bus position of
zaptel card. This feature allow to associate a configuration with a zaptel
card.
If you change the disposition of device or add another card, having the
information where the cards is placed. 

You have one Wildcard TE110P placed into pci bus position 0:c.0
If you add another Wildcard TE110P to pci bus position 0:9.0, the
configuration of first Wildcard is assigned to this second card. With the
info of position of device, you can find the problem and modify
zaptel.conf.

Into patch is added lszt command that show the pci bus info.

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 qwell - 01-11-08 14:18  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
If I read the last note right, the reporter agreed that the code added was
the same end result, just in a different way.

Because of this, I'm going to go ahead and close this issue. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
01-11-08 14:18  qwell          Status                   new => resolved     
01-11-08 14:18  qwell          Resolution               open => fixed       
01-11-08 14:18  qwell          Assigned To               => qwell           
01-11-08 14:18  qwell          Note Added: 0076740                          
======================================================================