[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0008089]: [patch] The record# parameter in ENUMLOOKUP is ignored

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8089 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                otmar
Assigned To:                oej
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   8089
Category:                   Functions/func_enum
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     ready for testing
Asterisk Version:            SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 50028 
Disclaimer on File?:        Yes 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             10-04-2006 10:19 CDT
Last Modified:              01-07-2008 16:20 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] The record# parameter in ENUMLOOKUP is
ignored
Description: 
In function_enum, the args.record parameter is never evaluated. 

That's also a bug in ast_get_enum, which does not offer a seperate
parameter for this.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0005526 [patch] Carrier ENUM support + some rew...
related to          0005666 [patch][post 1.4] Add NAPTR string pars...
related to          0011560 ENUM LOOKUP IS NOT WORKING AGAIN
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 alexnikolov - 01-07-08 16:20  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
and I have..
patching file func_enum.c
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=1 FAILED at 35.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=2 FAILED at 82.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=3 FAILED at 447.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=4 FAILED at 498.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5 FAILED at 507.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=6 FAILED at 562.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7 FAILED at 583.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8 FAILED at 613.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9 FAILED at 622.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10 FAILED at 636.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11 FAILED at 658.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12 FAILED at 672.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13 FAILED at 696.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14 FAILED at 706.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=15 FAILED at 720.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=16 FAILED at 755.
Hunk http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=17 FAILED at 1002.
17 out of 17 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file func_enum.c.rej 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
01-07-08 16:20  alexnikolov    Note Added: 0076459                          
======================================================================