[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0012081]: Build fails on PPC64

noreply at bugs.digium.com noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Feb 26 22:44:55 CST 2008


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12081 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                jcollie
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   12081
Category:                   Core/BuildSystem
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0-beta4 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             02-26-2008 22:38 CST
Last Modified:              02-26-2008 22:44 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Build fails on PPC64
Description: 
Build of Asterisk fails on PPC64 because build_tools/strip_nonapi uses "nm"
to get a list of symbols out of the asterisk binary.  However, the output
of "nm" on PPC64 is different from the output on other platforms.  The
problem is especially difficult to diagnose because the invocation of
build_tools/strip_nonapi is unconditionally hidden.  I'll be attaching a
patch developed by David Woodhouse that fixes both of these problems.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 jcollie - 02-26-08 22:44  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
On second thought I'm just going to link to David's patch since by
uploading the patch I would be asserting that I wrote the patch which isn't
true.  David's patch can be found here:

http://david.woodhou.se/asterisk-1.6.0-beta4-funcdesc.patch

The original Fedora bug report can be found here:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435035

As indicated in the Fedora bug report, David Woodhouse should have a
disclaimer on file... 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
02-26-08 22:44  jcollie        Note Added: 0083004                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list