[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0005413]: [branch] Secure RTP (SRTP)
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Dec 22 12:19:36 CST 2008
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5413
======================================================================
Reported By: mikma
Assigned To: otherwiseguy
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 5413
Category: Channels/chan_sip/NewFeature
Reproducibility: N/A
Severity: feature
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
Asterisk Version: SVN
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!): 48491
Disclaimer on File?: Yes
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2005-10-09 10:36 CDT
Last Modified: 2008-12-22 12:19 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [branch] Secure RTP (SRTP)
Description:
This patch adds initial support for secure RTP using libsrt[1]. It can
be used in for example an implementation of the sdecriptions draft[2].
[1] http://srtp.sourceforge.net/srtp.html
[2]
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-mmusic-sdescriptions-12.txt
Update (17/12/2008): Branch against trunk is located here
http://svn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/team/group/srtp
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to 0010129 Module SRTP can't loaded
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0096833) otherwiseguy (administrator) - 2008-12-22 12:19
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=5413#c96833
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yeah, if asterisk support was the problem, no phones would have SRTP at all
now. :-) If Asterisk *only* supported MIKEY, then it might make a
difference to them. But as blitzrage mentioned, if they have another path
to get the features that MIKEY provides, then I doubt they spend their
limited resources on multiple technologies that do the same thing.
But yeah, what I'm really asking is, "Can we merge the sdescriptions stuff
w/o MIKEY, since they are better tested and MIKEY isn't required to work
with *any* devices in the field now?" We can leave the code for MIKEY up
in a branch somewhere and if someone gets around to showing it some love
(and find at least two implementations to test against) it can get merged
some day as well. I just don't want to hold this up any longer than we
have to, if noone knows of anything that supports it, anyway.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2008-12-22 12:19 otherwiseguy Note Added: 0096833
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list