[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013545]: Channel re-invited on destination ringing not re-invited back if ringing abandoned.

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Thu Dec 18 11:14:25 CST 2008


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13545 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                davidw
Assigned To:                file
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   13545
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     closed
Asterisk Version:           1.4.21.2 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
Resolution:                 fixed
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-09-23 08:25 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-12-18 11:14 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Channel re-invited on destination ringing not
re-invited back if ringing abandoned.
Description: 
An incoming SIP call is answered by an agent and then AMI transferred to a
PSTN line on Cisco CCM.  The Cisco provides SDP on the Ringing response and
Asterisk re-invites the incoming call immediately it gets that response.

The Dial command times out and cancels the outgoing call, but at no time
does the re-invite get undone, even when the dialplan eventually
successfully returns the call to the agent.  The result is a silent call.

The un-re-invite can be forced by parking the call and then unparking it
(in this case with an AMI Originate which queues it back to an agent).

This is a big problem for us as it is important for our application that
as many calls as possible have their speech path removed from the Asterisk
system.

I am also concerned that specifying multiple destinations in the Dial
command, may not inhibit the re-invite, leading to conflicting re-invites,
in the order of the Ringing events.  However, I haven't confirmed that this
is the case.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0096630) svnbot (reporter) - 2008-12-18 11:14
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13545#c96630 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Repository: asterisk
Revision: 165603

_U  branches/1.6.0/
U   branches/1.6.0/main/rtp.c

------------------------------------------------------------------------
r165603 | file | 2008-12-18 11:14:24 -0600 (Thu, 18 Dec 2008) | 18 lines

Merged revisions 165599 via svnmerge from 
https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/trunk

................
  r165599 | file | 2008-12-18 13:13:32 -0400 (Thu, 18 Dec 2008) | 11 lines
  
  Merged revisions 165591 via svnmerge from 
  https://origsvn.digium.com/svn/asterisk/branches/1.4
  
  ........
    r165591 | file | 2008-12-18 13:11:42 -0400 (Thu, 18 Dec 2008) | 4
lines
    
    Only care about a compatible codec for early bridging if we are
actually bridging to another channel. If we are not we actually want to
bring the audio back to us.
    (closes issue http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13545)
    Reported by: davidw
  ........
................

------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://svn.digium.com/view/asterisk?view=rev&revision=165603 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-12-18 11:14 svnbot         Checkin                                      
2008-12-18 11:14 svnbot         Note Added: 0096630                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list