[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0014023]: UK caller ID on X100P, not working

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14023 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                coops
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   14023
Category:                   Channels/chan_dahdi
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           1.4.22 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-12-05 03:02 CST
Last Modified:              2008-12-17 10:35 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    UK caller ID on X100P, not working
Description: 
I have searched High and low, but can't find a patch suitable for asterisk
1.4.22 and the zaptel drivers 1.4.12.1 Do they still exist? I have got a
patch to install on the zaptel driver - but it makes no difference.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0012531 UK CallerID on TDM400P not reliable
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0096542) davidw (reporter) - 2008-12-17 10:35
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=14023#c96542 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
This is getting off track, but the hypothetical assignment would have been
to the person that modified the patch, not to Digium.  On the other hand, I
also doubt there has been a case where Digium has accepted code licenced in
a similar way to the licensing to Digium, but to a third party, who then
signs the Digium disclaimer.  (The Digium licence is attempting to get an
effect similar to assignment but without some of the down sides for the
contributor.) 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-12-17 10:35 davidw         Note Added: 0096542                          
======================================================================