[asterisk-bugs] [LibPRI 0012816]: Nortel to Asterisk (card Sangoma A101) by qsig no pass caller name

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Fri Dec 12 16:32:37 CST 2008


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12816 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                silverx
Assigned To:                mattf
====================================================================== 
Project:                    LibPRI
Issue ID:                   12816
Category:                   General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     acknowledged
Asterisk Version:           1.4.20.1 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-06-09 08:10 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-12-12 16:32 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Nortel to Asterisk (card Sangoma A101) by qsig no
pass caller name
Description: 
Hi 
I've an Asterisk 1.4.20.1 server with asterisk-addons-1.4.7, libpri-1.4.4,
zaptel-1.4.11 and wanpipe-3.2.5.
I've a connection: PBX Nortel By Qsig (sangoma) to Asterisk and
another connection: PBX Nortel by Qsig to Cisco call manager

The issue is: when I use a cisco phone to cal asterisk through channel
nortel --> Asterisk I can see the caller name (cisco routed to nortel).
Using nortel phone to Asterisk the caller name is missing (strange !!) 
In the log I recieve this message 

[Jun  9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: < Facility (len=40, codeset=0) [
[Jun  9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: 0x9F, 0xAA, 0x06, 0x80, 0x01,
0x00, 0x82, 0x01, 0x00, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x18, 0x02, 0x02, 0x01,
0x00, 0x06, 0x04, '+', 0x0C, 0x09, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0C, 'Luca Boriani'[Jun  9
14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c:  ]
[Jun  9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: !! Unable to handle ROSE
operation 722209024[Jun  9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c:  [ 80 0C 4C 75
63 61 20 42 6F 72 69 61 6E 69 ] - [..Luca Boriani]

can you help me please?
Thanks




====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0096345) jpeeler (administrator) - 2008-12-12 16:32
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12816#c96345 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
prado: If the code 722209024 is part of the standard, then I would think
that the proposed changes are fine. But I know very little about libPRI,
hence the reassigning. What documentation should be looked at to find all
the rose operations that are part of the protocol? 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-12-12 16:32 jpeeler        Note Added: 0096345                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list