[asterisk-bugs] [LibPRI 0012816]: Nortel to Asterisk (card Sangoma A101) by qsig no pass caller name
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Fri Dec 12 16:09:25 CST 2008
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12816
======================================================================
Reported By: silverx
Assigned To: mattf
======================================================================
Project: LibPRI
Issue ID: 12816
Category: General
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: acknowledged
Asterisk Version: 1.4.20.1
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2008-06-09 08:10 CDT
Last Modified: 2008-12-12 16:09 CST
======================================================================
Summary: Nortel to Asterisk (card Sangoma A101) by qsig no
pass caller name
Description:
Hi
I've an Asterisk 1.4.20.1 server with asterisk-addons-1.4.7, libpri-1.4.4,
zaptel-1.4.11 and wanpipe-3.2.5.
I've a connection: PBX Nortel By Qsig (sangoma) to Asterisk and
another connection: PBX Nortel by Qsig to Cisco call manager
The issue is: when I use a cisco phone to cal asterisk through channel
nortel --> Asterisk I can see the caller name (cisco routed to nortel).
Using nortel phone to Asterisk the caller name is missing (strange !!)
In the log I recieve this message
[Jun 9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: < Facility (len=40, codeset=0) [
[Jun 9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: 0x9F, 0xAA, 0x06, 0x80, 0x01,
0x00, 0x82, 0x01, 0x00, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x18, 0x02, 0x02, 0x01,
0x00, 0x06, 0x04, '+', 0x0C, 0x09, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0C, 'Luca Boriani'[Jun 9
14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: ]
[Jun 9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: !! Unable to handle ROSE
operation 722209024[Jun 9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: [ 80 0C 4C 75
63 61 20 42 6F 72 69 61 6E 69 ] - [..Luca Boriani]
can you help me please?
Thanks
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0096340) prado (reporter) - 2008-12-12 16:09
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12816#c96340
----------------------------------------------------------------------
jpeeler,
in ECMAV2, the SS_CNID_CALLINGNAME operation is assigned code "0",
in ECMAV1, the same operation has a diferent code. The code is
"722209024" and not "0". It´s just that.
All other rose operations have similar changes in their code number.
It´s ease to observe this by setting "pri debug" in asterisk and changing
the protocol version.
Unfortunatetly, today just a few rose operations are handled by libpri. It
would be nice to put all those operation codes in libpri, but this require
some time and testing.
I can help you by providing any information needed about the rose
operations if we decide to implement them. As a result, we will get full
interoperability between asterisk and other pbx like siemens, nortel,
avaya, etc..
If there is interest, I can help.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2008-12-12 16:09 prado Note Added: 0096340
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list