[asterisk-bugs] [LibPRI 0012816]: Nortel to Asterisk (card Sangoma A101) by qsig no pass caller name

Asterisk Bug Tracker noreply at bugs.digium.com
Fri Dec 12 16:09:25 CST 2008


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12816 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                silverx
Assigned To:                mattf
====================================================================== 
Project:                    LibPRI
Issue ID:                   12816
Category:                   General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     acknowledged
Asterisk Version:           1.4.20.1 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-06-09 08:10 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-12-12 16:09 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Nortel to Asterisk (card Sangoma A101) by qsig no
pass caller name
Description: 
Hi 
I've an Asterisk 1.4.20.1 server with asterisk-addons-1.4.7, libpri-1.4.4,
zaptel-1.4.11 and wanpipe-3.2.5.
I've a connection: PBX Nortel By Qsig (sangoma) to Asterisk and
another connection: PBX Nortel by Qsig to Cisco call manager

The issue is: when I use a cisco phone to cal asterisk through channel
nortel --> Asterisk I can see the caller name (cisco routed to nortel).
Using nortel phone to Asterisk the caller name is missing (strange !!) 
In the log I recieve this message 

[Jun  9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: < Facility (len=40, codeset=0) [
[Jun  9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: 0x9F, 0xAA, 0x06, 0x80, 0x01,
0x00, 0x82, 0x01, 0x00, 0x8B, 0x01, 0x00, 0xA1, 0x18, 0x02, 0x02, 0x01,
0x00, 0x06, 0x04, '+', 0x0C, 0x09, 0x00, 0x80, 0x0C, 'Luca Boriani'[Jun  9
14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c:  ]
[Jun  9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c: !! Unable to handle ROSE
operation 722209024[Jun  9 14:27:15] VERBOSE[6246] logger.c:  [ 80 0C 4C 75
63 61 20 42 6F 72 69 61 6E 69 ] - [..Luca Boriani]

can you help me please?
Thanks




====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0096340) prado (reporter) - 2008-12-12 16:09
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12816#c96340 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
jpeeler, 
in ECMAV2, the SS_CNID_CALLINGNAME operation is assigned code "0", 
in ECMAV1, the same operation has a diferent code.  The code is
"722209024" and not "0". It´s just that.

All other rose operations have similar changes in their code number. 
It´s ease to observe this by setting "pri debug" in asterisk and changing
the protocol version.

Unfortunatetly, today just a few rose operations are handled by libpri. It
would be nice to put all those operation codes in libpri, but this require
some time and testing.  
I can help you by providing any information needed about the rose
operations if we decide to implement them. As a result, we will get full
interoperability between asterisk and other pbx like siemens, nortel,
avaya, etc.. 

If there is interest, I can help. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-12-12 16:09 prado          Note Added: 0096340                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list