[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013355]: Dial(SIP/exten at host:port) ignores port

[Asterisk Bug Tracker]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13355 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                acunningham
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   13355
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     new
Asterisk Version:           1.4.21.1 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             2008-08-21 09:02 CDT
Last Modified:              2008-08-27 10:05 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Dial(SIP/exten at host:port) ignores port
Description: 
If you do a Dial to a non-standard port, for example:

Dial(SIP/conference at 1.2.3.4:5070)

the port (5070) is ignored by Asterisk.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 (0091793) acunningham (reporter) - 2008-08-27 10:05
 http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13355#c91793 
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Thank you. Unfortunately we can't put "port = 5070" in the peer because
this peer is actually intended to be for calls to OpenSER.

Perhaps the best thing would that if "port = 5060" was set in the peer in
extensions.conf, the peer would only match for calls to that port. If no
port was specified in the peer at all, the peer would match for calls to
any port at that IP address. This would, I think, make it work for us, work
for everyone else, and be a reasonably intuitive way of doing it. 

Issue History 
Date Modified    Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
2008-08-27 10:05 acunningham    Note Added: 0091793                          
======================================================================