[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0013258]: Registering asterisk to other port apart from by default 5060 port
Asterisk Bug Tracker
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Aug 11 04:51:06 CDT 2008
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13258
======================================================================
Reported By: destiny6628
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 13258
Category: Channels/chan_sip/Registration
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: 1.4.21.2
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 2008-08-08 02:15 CDT
Last Modified: 2008-08-11 04:51 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: Registering asterisk to other port apart from by
default 5060 port
Description:
Hi
I am trying to register a user id based and password account on asterisk
of net4india but on 2345 port apart from by default SIP port 5060 .
But i am unable to register on same because of the following reason
Retransmitting http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=1 (no NAT) to
202.71.134.13:2345:
REGISTER sip:202.71.134.13:2345 SIP/2.0
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 220.227.2.234:5060;branch=z9hG4bK58dcb721;rport
From: <sip:052231881 at 202.71.134.13>;tag=as1aa8835b
To: <sip:052231881 at 202.71.134.13>
Call-ID: 0e63f0cf6f16b67e37a465c64a7d24da at 127.0.0.1
CSeq: 117 REGISTER
User-Agent: Asterisk PBX
Max-Forwards: 70
Expires: 120
Contact: <sip:052231881 at 220.227.2.234>
Event: registration
Content-Length: 0
The problem i can see instead of sending the request on another port 2345
its still taking the port 5060 in
Via: SIP/2.0/UDP 220.227.2.234:5060;branch=z9hG4bK58dcb721;rport
.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
(0091281) destiny6628 (reporter) - 2008-08-11 04:51
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=13258#c91281
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi
Yes you are absolutely correct and this defintely violation of RFC3261.
bind port in the meanwhile time worked.
Thanks for the prompt response .
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
2008-08-11 04:51 destiny6628 Note Added: 0091281
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list