[asterisk-bugs] [LibSS7 0012484]: [patch] generic name support

noreply at bugs.digium.com noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Apr 21 11:01:05 CDT 2008


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12484 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                ptimmins
Assigned To:                mattf
====================================================================== 
Project:                    LibSS7
Issue ID:                   12484
Category:                   New/Feature
Reproducibility:            N/A
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.6.0-beta7.1 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             04-20-2008 23:45 CDT
Last Modified:              04-21-2008 11:01 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] generic name support
Description: 
I have added support to libss7-trunk and made changes in chan_zap to fully
implement generic name support.

to send generic name, have a dialplan rule similar to:
exten => s,n,Set(_SS7_JIP=yourjip)
exten => s,n,Set(_SS7_GENERIC_NAME=${CALLERID(name)})
exten => s,n,Dial(Zap/g1/[callednumber])

If you receive a call with a generic name in the generic name field, it
populates the proper internal asterisk variables to display name in the
same way any other channel type would (ISDN PRI/SIP/etc)
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 mattf - 04-21-08 11:01  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Thanks for the speedy response.  I have another question for you.  How
prevalent is this method used for sending name information in SS7?  If it's
the standard way of doing it, I think it might be worth us promoting this
to use the Asterisk caller ID information so we don't have to do it with
our own variable as we have been doing. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
04-21-08 11:01  mattf          Note Added: 0085755                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list