[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0012451]: join empty categories are not the same as leavewhenempty ones, joinempty probably wrong

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12451 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                davidw
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   12451
Category:                   Applications/app_queue
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  1.4  
SVN Revision (number only!): 114060 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             04-15-2008 11:14 CDT
Last Modified:              04-16-2008 04:26 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    join empty categories are not the same as
leavewhenempty ones, joinempty probably wrong
Description: 
Once one accounts for joinempty and leavewhenempty sort of having opposite
logical senses, one cannot match the effects of the values of these two
variables one for one.

joinempty = no matches leavewhenempty = yes

joinempty = yes matches leavewhenempty = no

However, joinempty = strict drops only for QUEUE_NO_REACHABLE_MEMBERS,
but

leavewhenempty = strict drops for both QUEUE_NO_MEMBERS and
QUEUE_NO_REACHABLE_MEMBERS.

====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 davidw - 04-16-08 04:26  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
What specifically makes me feel that the join implemenation of strict is
wrong is that, if you have a mixture of paused and unavailable members, the
unavailable member takes precedence. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
04-16-08 04:26  davidw         Note Added: 0085540                          
======================================================================