[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0012380]: [patch] T.38 support for chan_h323 with t.38 - t30 conversion
noreply at bugs.digium.com
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Apr 8 15:10:42 CDT 2008
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=12380
======================================================================
Reported By: may213
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 12380
Category: Channels/NewFeature
Reproducibility: always
Severity: feature
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: SVN
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): 1.4
SVN Revision (number only!): 112599
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 04-07-2008 19:33 CDT
Last Modified: 04-08-2008 15:10 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] T.38 support for chan_h323 with t.38 - t30
conversion
Description:
Hello!
There is patch for h323 channel code which enable t.38 proto support,
translate t.38 packets to alaw sound packets.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
sergee - 04-08-08 15:10
----------------------------------------------------------------------
may213,
First of all new features should be adjusted to trunk, and not to 1.4
branch. Second, i believe that most part of Asterisk developers are using
uLaw - not aLaw as we do :) so i think new feature should support both
modes natively.
Next thing - this patch depends on SpanDSP, so it can't be accepted into
asterisk, due to dual-licensing issues. BUT! It can be accepted into
asterisk-addons.
Here is a roadmap to get this feature in asterisk-addons (as i see it,
maybe someone will correct me):
1. Put hooks for t28 processing (converting to *Law) inside of h323
2. Add support for ulaw
3. Put all code related to spanDSP inside asterisk-addons (e.g. inside
app_fax, or may be res_fax etc..)
Also, i'm not sure that this feature is good from architectural point of
view. I believe that we need some general facility for relaying fax between
different channels, not some local hacks. But that's a long story, and your
code is already works.
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
04-08-08 15:10 sergee Note Added: 0085156
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list