[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0009299]: segfault after a while of operation (maybe a month)

noreply at bugs.digium.com noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Sep 25 04:00:44 CDT 2007


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9299 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                vazir
Assigned To:                PCadach
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   9299
Category:                   Channels/chan_h323
Reproducibility:            sometimes
Severity:                   crash
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     acknowledged
Asterisk Version:           1.4.1 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A 
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        No 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             03-16-2007 03:08 CDT
Last Modified:              09-25-2007 04:00 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    segfault after a while of operation (maybe a month)
Description: 
Subj. 
Asterisk 1.4.1

======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate       0010018 h323 crash on high volumn calls
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 PCadach - 09-25-07 04:00  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
As I can see, the common case when this can happens is when Asterisk
receives a call with goal set to e_callIndependentSupplementaryService,
when call to regular processing of Setup message is missing but Release
message handled as usual, causing creation of NULL call token in
chan_h323's call table.

Could someone please acknowledge my idea about wrong call goal parameter?


Thanks,
Paul. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
09-25-07 04:00  PCadach        Note Added: 0071056                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list