[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0009843]: [patch] /etc/init.d/asterisk is not "Linux Standard Base" compatible

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9843 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                ibc
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   9843
Category:                   Core/Configuration
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     needs license
Asterisk Version:           1.4.4 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        No 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             05-31-2007 05:14 CDT
Last Modified:              09-24-2007 02:58 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] /etc/init.d/asterisk is not "Linux Standard
Base" compatible
Description: 
As we can read at
http://www.linux-foundation.org/spec/refspecs/LSB_3.0.0/LSB-Core-generic/LSB-Core-generic/iniscrptact.html:

"For all other init-script actions, the init script shall return an exit
status of zero if the action was successful. Otherwise, the exit status
shall be non-zero, as defined below. In addition to straightforward
success, the following situations are also to be considered successful":

- "running start on a service already running"

But this is not true since "/etc/init.d/asterisk start" return 1 if
Asterisk was already running. It should return 0.

In fact this is because the default behaviout of "start-stop-daemon" which
returns error (1) after "start" if the service was already running. So it
could be Debian issue.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 ibc - 09-24-07 02:58  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I signed the license a month ago but still shows "License NONE".
Please, could somebody tell me why this still appears as "License NONE"?
Note that the top link "Sign" is not available for me now since I already
signed it.

Thanks for any help. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
09-24-07 02:58  ibc            Note Added: 0071019                          
======================================================================