[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010546]: [patch] Dundi support for true dynamic peering (the '*' mapping)
noreply at bugs.digium.com
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Tue Sep 18 03:26:32 CDT 2007
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10546
======================================================================
Reported By: dds
Assigned To: russell
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 10546
Category: PBX/pbx_dundi
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: feedback
Asterisk Version: SVN
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): trunk
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 08-24-2007 03:37 CDT
Last Modified: 09-18-2007 03:26 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] Dundi support for true dynamic peering (the
'*' mapping)
Description:
The sample configuration file for DUNDi claims that you can specify a '*'
peer as a special unspecified entity to match any peer. This is useful in
situations where you have a dynamic server pool, such as when doing speech
recognition processing on a grid, and you want to make use of DUNDi's
ability to find a server to forward the call to based on the current load.
The implementation of this was non-existent; apparently the person who
wrote the sample configuration file was under a different impression than
the author(s) of pbx_dundi.c. I've implemented this support and included a
patch in this bug. I would very much like this support to be included in
the next release, as I believe others would do.
Thanks,
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
has duplicate 0010703 look at <a href="http://bugs.digium.com...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
dds - 09-18-07 03:26
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Would a decent enough solution to make it so that in destroy_peer, the
peer->permit and peer->include are only free()d if they are different then
the any_peer->permit and any_peer->include, respectively?
Thanks,
David
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
09-18-07 03:26 dds Note Added: 0070721
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list