[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010719]: The same noise problem from bluetooth to asterisk
noreply at bugs.digium.com
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Sat Sep 15 06:17:43 CDT 2007
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10719
======================================================================
Reported By: gfdsa
Assigned To: dbowerman
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 10719
Category: Addons/chan_mobile
Reproducibility: always
Severity: major
Priority: normal
Status: assigned
Asterisk Version: 1.4.11
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 09-14-2007 07:03 CDT
Last Modified: 09-15-2007 06:17 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: The same noise problem from bluetooth to asterisk
Description:
It was already reported previously, but the bug was marked "closed" and I
don't see any way to reopen it.
0a12:0001 Cambridge Silicon Radio, Ltd Bluetooth Dongle (HCI mode)
LG-310 phone
Asterisk SVN-trunk-r81632M
chan_mobile.c:
Last Changed Author: tilghman
Last Changed Rev: 437
Last Changed Date: 2007-09-03 05:32:29 +0200 (Mon, 03 Sep 2007)
hci_scodata_packet: hci0 SCO packet for unknown connection handle 44
I'll try various bt/phone combinations ASAP, but does somebody have a hint
where to dig?
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
gfdsa - 09-15-07 06:17
----------------------------------------------------------------------
It did before, now after I've patched the kernel it is silent on both ends
will recompile the kernel w/o the patches...
also I've noticed that I have:
< ACL 00:19:A1:63:84:B1 handle 43 state 1 lm SLAVE
> SCO 00:19:A1:63:84:B1 handle 0 state 5 lm SLAVE
when in the log the scodata complains about handle 42 ...
I understand that it should be the handle 0, right?
Dave, thanks for being so responsive
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
09-15-07 06:17 gfdsa Note Added: 0070611
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list