[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0007495]: [patch][post-1.4] AOC-D ("Advice of Charge - During call") passthrough

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7495 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                alexmayrhofer
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   7495
Category:                   Channels/chan_zap
Reproducibility:            N/A
Severity:                   feature
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     ready for testing
Asterisk Version:            SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 37561 
Disclaimer on File?:        Yes 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             07-06-2006 05:11 CDT
Last Modified:              09-12-2007 16:28 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch][post-1.4] AOC-D ("Advice of Charge - During
call") passthrough
Description: 
The attached patch modifies chan_zap to pass AOC-D messages (Q.956) between
bridged channels.

In addition to this patch, a patch to libpri
(http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=7494) is required for passthrough to
work.

======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
child of            0007494 [patch][post 1.4] Decoding / Encoding /...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 jmls - 09-12-07 16:28  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
this had been updated to trunk, but didn't get looked at. 

Is it worth me asking the guy for another patch for trunk, or should we
close this ? 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
09-12-07 16:28  jmls           Note Added: 0070431                          
======================================================================