[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010976]: NAT settings ignored on calls recieved to [general]

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

The following issue requires your FEEDBACK. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10976 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                jtodd
Assigned To:                file
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   10976
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:            SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!): 85542 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             10-14-2007 13:25 CDT
Last Modified:              10-15-2007 08:38 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    NAT settings ignored on calls recieved to [general]
Description: 

I have "nat=yes" set in the [general] section of sip.conf, but RTP media
continues to go (on the *->UA flow) to the "theoretical address" instead of
the "recieved address" on calls received from anonymous hosts to my *
server. 
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 file - 10-15-07 08:38  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Yeah, I would like to see the SIP debug and an rtp debug. I just tested it
between my home, through NAT, to my public Asterisk running latest trunk
with no matching user/pass and it worked fine. I did, however, remember
that rizzo did some NAT stuff in SIP that depended on the signalling awhile
back though... maybe that is it. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
10-15-07 08:38  file           Note Added: 0071976                          
10-15-07 08:38  file           Status                   assigned => feedback
======================================================================