[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0011382]: Dial option G does not handle labels under some conditions
noreply at bugs.digium.com
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Fri Nov 30 18:08:23 CST 2007
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=11382
======================================================================
Reported By: jon
Assigned To: putnopvut
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 11382
Category: Applications/app_dial
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: ready for testing
Asterisk Version: 1.4.13
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: N/A
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 11-26-2007 17:35 CST
Last Modified: 11-30-2007 18:08 CST
======================================================================
Summary: Dial option G does not handle labels under some
conditions
Description:
The G option is able to process the priority at G(label) but not
G(label)+1. Using G(s^label) seems to work fine so I'm using that as a
workaround.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
jon - 11-30-07 18:08
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Close,
The supplied patch caused both the called and calling party to jump to the
same extension. Made the following change and created 11382-2.patch. Dial's
G option now works as intended on 1.4.13 with a 21 line fudge. I don't
think the huge comment is necessary, but it doesn't hurt...
-peer->priority = chan->priority + 1;
+peer->priority = chan->priority + 2;
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
11-30-07 18:08 jon Note Added: 0074622
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list