[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010217]: [patch] proper user information layer 1 handling
noreply at bugs.digium.com
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Nov 26 03:16:22 CST 2007
A NOTE has been added to this issue.
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10217
======================================================================
Reported By: klaus3000
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 10217
Category: Channels/chan_zap
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: SVN
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: Yes
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 07-17-2007 04:49 CDT
Last Modified: 11-26-2007 03:16 CST
======================================================================
Summary: [patch] proper user information layer 1 handling
Description:
Hi!
Using Asterisk as H324M Gateway requires correct Q.931 signaling.
Currently Asterisk does not care about User Information Layer 1 signaling
in Bearer Capability IE.
======================================================================
Relationships ID Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to 0010189 Incorrect "user information layer ...
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
klaus3000 - 11-26-07 03:16
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hi!
This patch does not add any new member to ast_chan or zt_pvt structure. It
only extends existing code to handle userinformationlayer1 correclty for
digital call. Current behavior only deals with a-law/u-law thus does not
handle digital calls correctly.
userinformationlayer1 is an ast_chan member. Probably this is not the best
place for a proprietary ISDN extension but it is there already thus I
reused it. It would be better to extend Asterisk to handle digital
connection also in core (se the very long discussion on dev-mailinglist
(grep for AST_FRAME_DIGITAL)
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
11-26-07 03:16 klaus3000 Note Added: 0074303
======================================================================
More information about the asterisk-bugs
mailing list