[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010479]: Registration/Un-Registration Problem with chan_skinny

noreply at bugs.digium.com noreply at bugs.digium.com
Thu Nov 15 17:30:07 CST 2007


A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10479 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                sbisker
Assigned To:                qwell
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   10479
Category:                   Channels/chan_skinny
Reproducibility:            random
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:            1.4.10  
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             08-17-2007 06:54 CDT
Last Modified:              11-15-2007 17:30 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Registration/Un-Registration Problem with
chan_skinny
Description: 
Having a problem with channels becoming partially unregistered.  This is
happening with 7920 and 7921 phones.  At some point during the day,
asterisk thinks that the  device becomes unregistered.  If you do a "skinny
show devices"  the device appears that it is registered, and the phone
screen indicates that it is registered.  However when making a call, the
following is in the log.


[Aug 16 09:46:14] VERBOSE[13870] logger.c:     -- Starting simple switch
on '5264 at 5264'
[Aug 16 09:46:15] DEBUG[12158] chan_skinny.c: Current sub
[Skinny/5264 at 5264-148] already has owner
[Aug 16 09:46:15] WARNING[13870] chan_skinny.c: Asked to transmit to a
non-existant session!
[Aug 16 09:46:15] NOTICE[13870] chan_skinny.c: Asked to indicate 'Stop
tone' condition on channel Skinny/5264 at 5264-148, but sessio
n does not exist.
[Aug 16 09:46:15] WARNING[13870] chan_skinny.c: Asked to transmit to a
non-existant session!
[Aug 16 09:46:15] NOTICE[13870] chan_skinny.c: Asked to indicate 'Stop
tone' condition on channel Skinny/5264 at 5264-148, but sessio
n does not exist.
[Aug 16 09:46:15] WARNING[13870] chan_skinny.c: Asked to transmit to a
non-existant session!
[Aug 16 09:46:15] NOTICE[13870] chan_skinny.c: Asked to indicate 'Stop
tone' condition on channel Skinny/5264 at 5264-148, but sessio
n does not exist.
[Aug 16 09:46:16] WARNING[13870] chan_skinny.c: Asked to transmit to a
non-existant session!
[Aug 16 09:46:16] VERBOSE[13870] logger.c:     -- Executing
[7848 at longdistance:1] Dial("Skinny/5264 at 5264-148",
"IAX2/isdpbx:password at isdpbx/7848||r") in new stack



If I do a "core show channels" no skinny sessions are shown, and no
channels are active for that device.  On a side note  can't do a "skinny
set debug" because asterisk crashes because the session doesn't exist, and
the debug code references session and not device.  I'll submit another bug
for this one too, if you want.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 wedhorn - 11-15-07 17:30  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
Yeah, I was only thinking of having it as additional code. But on further
thinking, what happens at the transport layer. If there is a temporary
network disruption and we send a reset (because of not receiving a
keepalive), what happens to the reset tcp packet that we send? Does it just
get dropped with no feedback, does it keep on trying until it suceeds? 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
11-15-07 17:30  wedhorn        Note Added: 0073757                          
======================================================================




More information about the asterisk-bugs mailing list