[Asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010144]: No license statemement in the sound tarballs

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10144 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                zenon
Assigned To:                kpfleming
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   10144
Category:                   Sounds
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     assigned
Asterisk Version:           1.4.6 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        No 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             07-07-2007 06:30 CDT
Last Modified:              07-09-2007 10:59 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    No license statemement in the sound tarballs
Description: 
I just packaged the en/es/fr sounds in an rpm
(http://www.provocation.net/rpms/ ) and put "GPL" as the license in lack of
better. Obviously, the GPL works for code, not for sound recordings. No
matter how I search the websites though, I can't find any reference to a
license for the sounds. Strictly speaking, when no explicit license to
redistribute is given, copyright applies and redistribution is forbidden.
This is not a good situation, so perhaps you could add a CC license or
similar to the CREDITS-asterisk-core-<lang>-<version> files.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 zenon - 07-09-07 10:59  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
If your intention is to apply conditions similar to the GPL, the Creative
Commons Attribution-Share Alike license gets very close and should be
ideal. It allows non-commercial and commercial use, redistribution and
modification, requires attribution to the original licensor and
re-licensing of derivatives under the same license and it even contains a
"no warranty" provision. 

http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/legalcode 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
07-09-07 10:59  zenon          Note Added: 0066809                          
======================================================================