[Asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010096]: "Maximum PBX stack exceeded" raised by including more than AST_PBX_MAX_STACK *not nested* contexts
noreply at bugs.digium.com
noreply at bugs.digium.com
Mon Jul 2 11:46:55 CDT 2007
email_notification_title_for_action_bugnote_submitted
======================================================================
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10096
======================================================================
Reported By: AlexB
Assigned To:
======================================================================
Project: Asterisk
Issue ID: 10096
Category: PBX/General
Reproducibility: always
Severity: minor
Priority: normal
Status: new
Asterisk Version: 1.2.19
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A
SVN Revision (number only!):
Disclaimer on File?: No
Request Review:
======================================================================
Date Submitted: 07-02-2007 04:54 CDT
Last Modified: 07-02-2007 11:46 CDT
======================================================================
Summary: "Maximum PBX stack exceeded" raised by including
more than AST_PBX_MAX_STACK *not nested* contexts
Description:
Including more than 127 contexts causes
Jul 2 11:16:22 WARNING[5561] pbx.c: Maximum PBX stack exceeded
Please note they are not nested, but just included in one single context.
The value depends by AST_PBX_MAX_STACK, which is set to 128. Anyway this is
supposed to be the maximum depth, not the number of includes.
This behaviour has already been pointed out on the dev mailing list:
http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-dev/2007-June/028164.html
There are also other threads opened, but unfortunately the discussion was
not fed by any developer. However this is a bug and plain Asterisk files to
reproduce it are attached.
======================================================================
----------------------------------------------------------------------
AlexB - 07-02-07 11:46
----------------------------------------------------------------------
OK, given it's not a bug this report should be closed.
Anyway do you think it may be increased w/o affecting performances,
please? I think so, however an answer from a developer here or on the
mailing list would be really appreciated. :) Thanks in advance!
Issue History
Date Modified Username Field Change
======================================================================
07-02-07 04:54 AlexB New Issue
07-02-07 04:54 AlexB Asterisk Version => 1.2.19
07-02-07 04:54 AlexB SVN Branch (only for SVN checkou => N/A
07-02-07 04:54 AlexB Disclaimer on File? => No
07-02-07 04:56 AlexB File Added: extensions.conf
07-02-07 04:57 AlexB File Added: sip.conf
07-02-07 10:33 Corydon76 Note Added: 0066403
07-02-07 10:52 AlexB Note Added: 0066410
======================================================================
More information about the Asterisk-bugs
mailing list