[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0008089]: [patch] The record# parameter in ENUMLOOKUP is ignored

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=8089 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                otmar
Assigned To:                oej
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   8089
Category:                   Functions/func_enum
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     ready for testing
Asterisk Version:            SVN 
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases):  trunk 
SVN Revision (number only!): 50028 
Disclaimer on File?:        Yes 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             10-04-2006 10:19 CDT
Last Modified:              12-02-2007 12:27 CST
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    [patch] The record# parameter in ENUMLOOKUP is
ignored
Description: 
In function_enum, the args.record parameter is never evaluated. 

That's also a bug in ast_get_enum, which does not offer a seperate
parameter for this.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0005526 [patch] Carrier ENUM support + some rew...
related to          0005666 [patch][post 1.4] Add NAPTR string pars...
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 jtodd - 12-02-07 12:27  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
snuffy: I guess I'm unclear on why you would leave out the options.  There
were multiple, fairly important things in the options list that are not
replicable just with a query.  (ISN, Infrastructure mode, direct DNS query,
removal of method-type) 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
12-02-07 12:27  jtodd          Note Added: 0074653                          
======================================================================