[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0009561]: agents assigned to multiple queues and weight=0 cause callers be handled in wrong order

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=9561 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                hehol
Assigned To:                putnopvut
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   9561
Category:                   Core/Configuration
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   minor
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:            1.2.17  
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        Yes 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             04-19-2007 07:00 CDT
Last Modified:              08-13-2007 09:57 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    agents assigned to multiple queues and weight=0
cause callers be handled in wrong order
Description: 
Assume the following setup:

- two queues
- weight=0 or undefined (thus default 0) in queues.conf 
- one dynamic agent logged onto the server

When placing calls in both queues, the calls are being handled
first-in-last-out instead of first-in-first-out, i.e. the last caller to
join either of the two queues will be served to the agent first.
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 putnopvut - 08-13-07 09:57  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
I've tried reproducing this in 1.2 and 1.4 but I couldn't get it to happen
either way.

Could you post any relevant sections from extensions.conf?

Also, if you don't mind, could you check to be sure that you can still do
this in 1.4. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
08-13-07 09:57  putnopvut      Note Added: 0068770                          
======================================================================