[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010391]: Asterisk Crashes in Function "retrans_pkt"

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

A NOTE has been added to this issue. 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10391 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                callguy
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   10391
Category:                   Channels/chan_sip/General
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   crash
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     feedback
Asterisk Version:           1.4.9  
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!):  
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             08-06-2007 14:48 CDT
Last Modified:              08-06-2007 17:52 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    Asterisk Crashes in Function "retrans_pkt"
Description: 
We are seeing asterisk crash with what appears to be a race condition in
chan_sip, apparently around packet retransmission. A BT Full from asterisk
made with "don't optimize" is included. This appears related to, but
slightly different than 10256.
======================================================================
Relationships       ID      Summary
----------------------------------------------------------------------
related to          0010256 Segfault in do_monitor/ast_sched_runq
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 callguy - 08-06-07 17:52  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
We usually run against release versions only, if we patch this against the
1.4.9 source do you think that would be a problem (as opposed to rev
78241)? I have verified that it does patch cleanly, but want to be sure it
may not have other adverse effects. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
08-06-07 17:52  callguy        Note Added: 0068526                          
======================================================================