[asterisk-bugs] [Asterisk 0010384]: When using Asterisk RealTime, processing does not continue after queue command

[noreply at bugs.digium.com]

The following issue has been CLOSED 
====================================================================== 
http://bugs.digium.com/view.php?id=10384 
====================================================================== 
Reported By:                unservices
Assigned To:                
====================================================================== 
Project:                    Asterisk
Issue ID:                   10384
Category:                   Applications/app_queue
Reproducibility:            always
Severity:                   major
Priority:                   normal
Status:                     closed
Asterisk Version:            1.2.23  
SVN Branch (only for SVN checkouts, not tarball releases): N/A  
SVN Revision (number only!): 45332 
Disclaimer on File?:        N/A 
Request Review:              
Resolution:                 no change required
Fixed in Version:           
====================================================================== 
Date Submitted:             08-05-2007 11:19 CDT
Last Modified:              08-05-2007 12:25 CDT
====================================================================== 
Summary:                    When using Asterisk RealTime, processing does not
continue after queue command
Description: 
I'm using asterisk realtime. The extensions db does have 3 records for each
incoming number - first is a deadagi to prepare some settings, then either
a dial or queue command, finally another deadagi to finish some
calculations.

When the instruction sequence is DEADAGI -> DIAL SIP -> DEADAGI everything
works fine. But when the sequence is DEADAGI -> QUEUE -> DEADAGI we don't
have the return to process the last agi script.

It sounds that at the end of the queue processing the control is not
coming back to the extensions information. Maybe a bug in the queue
application?
====================================================================== 

---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
 Corydon76 - 08-05-07 12:25  
---------------------------------------------------------------------- 
By your response, I have to conclude that you simply did not know that the
'h' extension existed.  Please read the documentation and use the 'h'
extension. 

Issue History 
Date Modified   Username       Field                    Change               
====================================================================== 
08-05-07 12:25  Corydon76      Note Added: 0068456                          
08-05-07 12:25  Corydon76      Status                   new => closed       
08-05-07 12:25  Corydon76      Resolution               open => no change
required
======================================================================