Hello!<div><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 3:59 PM, Hans Petter Selasky <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:hselasky@c2i.net">hselasky@c2i.net</a>></span> wrote:<br><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div><div class="h5">> > The HFC-4S/8S cards are already supported by ISDN4BSD (FreeBSD 7,8,9).<br>
> ><br>
> > <a href="http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/isdn4bsd" target="_blank">http://www.selasky.org/hans_petter/isdn4bsd</a><br>
><br>
> They are, but ISDN4BSD requires non-stock chan_capi.<br>
<br>
</div></div>And what is the problem about that? The stock chan_capi used to have some<br>
important features missing like dynamic config reload, and is not BSD<br>
licensed!</blockquote><div><br></div><div>I acidentally replied in private. Re-sending to mailing list:</div><div><br></div><div><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: 13px; border-collapse: collapse; ">I am mostly concerned not about features (or license), but about maintainability.<br>
>From this POV stock is always better.</span></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;"><br></span></font></div><div><font class="Apple-style-span" face="arial, sans-serif"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse;">Max</span></font></div>
</div></div>